ROBO -GOLF: Robotic mowers for better turf quality, reduced fertiliser cost and less use of fossil energy on golf course fairways and semi-roughs

Summary

In WP1 and WP2, field trials at NIBIO Landvik comparing robotic and manual mowing were continued from 2020 and 2021. A dry autumn 2021 combined with a very dry spring and summer 2022 affected the trial area severely, with dry spots and outbreaks of antracnose in some of the experimental plots, and white clover developed markedly in both manual and robotic mown plots, especially in the semi-rough and in Kentucky bluegrass in the fairway. Irrigation was done in spring and summer.

In WP1, turfgrass quality in the fairway plots of colonial bentgrass was significantly lower than for the other species (regardless of mowing system). From June to August less white clover was observed in the robotic mown fairway plots compared with the manual mown plots. In the semi-rough the situation was the opposite with more white clover in the robotic mown plots. Lower ratings of turfgrass quality in the robotic mown semi-rough were explained by the higher coverage of white clover, most obviously in perennial ryegrass. In September root length and thatch accumulation were measured in sandplots in the fairway trial. No differences between robotic and manual mowing were found here.

In WP2, the N fertiliser effect of return of clippings at robotic vs. manual mowing showed a trend for higher quality with robotic mowing, but the difference from manual mowing with return of clippings was not significant. In both mowing systems and at all fertiliser levels, return of clippings gave significantly higher turfgrass quality compared with when clippings were removed. Regarding turfgrass quality and clipping yields, return of clippings corresponded to around 60 kg N/ha/year in this experiment. A trend for more white clover with robotic mowing on unfertilised fairway plots was observed, and confirmed the observations from WP1 semi-rough.

In WP3, demonstration trials at fairway and rough on five golf courses compared robotic and traditional mowers. Observations in 2022 from Bærheim GC, Norway, showed more dry spots and diseases in traditional mown fairway compared with robotic mown. At Hirsala GC in Finland, observations of less compaction resulted in improved drainage on the robotic mown areas compared with the traditional mown areas.

Contact
Karin J. Hesselsøe

Karin J. Hesselsøe, Norwegian Institute for Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), Department for Urban Greening and Vegetation Ecology, Turfgrass Research Group, Landvik, Reddalsveien 215, 4886 Grimstad, Phone:+47 41396851. E-mail:karin.hesselsoe@nibio.no

FACTS
Category: Water, nutrients, construction
Status: Ongoing
Project period: 2020 - 2023

Fundings (kSEK)

 

2020

2021

2022

2023

Total

STERF

250

326

336

160

1072

Husqvarna

952

376

396

304

2028

Participating golf courses

81

83

83

0

250

Total

1283

785

818

464

3350

 

Project objectives

  • To generate and disseminate knowledge about implications for turfgrass quality, fertiliser requirement, weed encroachment and susceptibility to various diseases of switching from conventional manual mowers to robotic mowers on fairways and semi-roughs with grass species typical for Nordic golf courses.

  • To generate and disseminate knowledge about implications for labour and energy use, CO2-emissions and soil compaction of switching from conventional manual mowers to robotic mowers on fairways and semi-roughs with grass species typical for Nordic golf courses.

  • To generate and disseminate knowledge about implications for player and greenkeeper satisfaction of switching from conventional manual mowers to robotic mowers on fairways and semi-roughs with grass species typical for Nordic golf courses.

 

VIDEOS

Film about the ROBO-GOLF project (YouTube)